Headline comparison · a headline beside the passage it cites, also called Drift

Headline Comparison

Each entry is one primary document, the passage recorded from it word for word, and every headline that cites it. Each headline is compared with the passage on 6 axes, and the comparison says which axis differs and how. It does not score anyone.

4
documents on file
16
comparisons made
2
a person should look at
9
not enough of the source on file
0
reviewed by an editor
What the comparison found
requires review2
different aspects1
inconclusive4
insufficient context9
consistent paraphrase0
Which axis differed
Scope and qualifications1
Certainty1
Headline wording, as classified by the published rule
No qualifying verb found12
Conditional language4
How much of each source is on file
phrase1
sentence2
passage1

Every comparison here is produced by a published rule and is labeled as such. A comparison an editor has reviewed says so, and keeps what the rule had said beside it. The 6 axes and the words each one looks for.

How accurate is this?

Measured against a synthetic test set, not against these comparisons

32 hand-written test cases exercise rule version c2, the same code that produced every comparison on this page. Each case states in advance what the comparator should say and, where it should flag something, which axis. These are not real outlets or real quotes; they are written to cover a true difference on each axis, a fair paraphrase, a headline about an unrelated subject, a fragment too short to compare, and a reversed claim. The comparator matched the expected result on every case.

This is not human review

These rates describe how the rule performs on a fixed set of invented cases written to test it, not how often a person has confirmed the comparisons above are right. Every comparison on this page stays labeled "by rule" until an editor reviews it, whatever this panel says.

AxisTest casesCaught correctlyMissedAbstained insteadFired when it should not have
Certainty1 100% 0% 0% 0
Figures, units and timeframes2 100% 0% 0% 0
Scope and qualifications2 100% 0% 0% 0
Attribution1 100% 0% 0% 0
An attempt against a result1 100% 0% 0% 0
Whether it happened at all1 100% 0% 0% 0

Caught correctly: the comparator flagged the case and named the axis this set expects. Missed: the comparator flagged something else, or nothing, on a case built to have this axis differ. Abstained instead: the comparator reported no discrepancy at all rather than naming the wrong axis. Fired when it should not have: this axis was reported on a case, of any kind, where this set did not expect it, including the fair-paraphrase and unrelated-subject cases built to catch exactly that. Generated Nov 11, 2026 by re-running scripts/claims-eval.mjs; re-run it after any change to worker/src/claims.js.

Document and headlines · P01

Anthropic September 2026 threat report, biological cases

Every headline below is compared with the passage on 6 axes: certainty, figures, scope, attribution, whether an attempt became a result, and whether it happened at all. Nothing here counts words.

The passage, as recorded

could support biological weapons development

anthropic.com · recorded as a phrase, 2026-09-10 · Open the document · re-read 2026-09-12

Nothing is compared here yet

The Monitor has a phrase from the source, not enough of it to place a headline against. A phrase shares little wording with anything, so calling a headline consistent or inconsistent with it would be reading too much into too little. The full passage has to be recorded first.

7 headlines cite this document and are waiting on it: CNN, Daily Caller, Interesting Engineering, Just the News, The New York Times, Tech Times, The Washington Times. Each is on file with its own link; none is described as agreeing or disagreeing with anything.

Correct this comparison

Document and headlines · P02

WeWorm research, time to build

Every headline below is compared with the passage on 6 axes: certainty, figures, scope, attribution, whether an attempt became a result, and whether it happened at all. Nothing here counts words.

The passage, as recorded

found the bug and wrote the first remote code execution (RCE) exploit in about two days

calif.io · recorded as a sentence, 2026-09-08 · Open the document · re-read 2026-09-12

insufficient context
X (individual posts) · 2026-09-08

Barely more than a week

insufficient contextby rule

What is on file for this outlet is a fragment rather than the headline as published. Comparing a fragment would compare whichever part of the headline happened to be recorded.

Correct this comparison

Document and headlines · P03

Agent count in the Hugging Face incident, statement versus the report it cites

Every headline below is compared with the passage on 6 axes: certainty, figures, scope, attribution, whether an attempt became a result, and whether it happened at all. Nothing here counts words.

The passage, as recorded

~1200 agents sent >70,000 messages and files on an unsanctioned message board, and ~700 attacked Hugging Face

metr.org · recorded as a sentence, 2026-08-26 · Open the document · re-read 2026-09-19

inconclusive
Office of Senator Hawley · 2026-09-10

more than 1,200 AI agents broke out of their testing environment and exchanged over 70,000 messages and files with each other

inconclusiveby rule

No listed difference was found. The rules cover certainty, figures, scope, attribution, attempt versus outcome and polarity, and are silent on everything else, including who a claim is about and whether the passage makes it at all. Silence from the rules is not a finding that the two agree, so this one needs a person.

insufficient context
Office of Senator Sanders · 2026-09-03

over 1,000 AI agents

insufficient contextby rule

What is on file for this outlet is a fragment rather than the headline as published. Comparing a fragment would compare whichever part of the headline happened to be recorded.

Correct this comparison

Document and headlines · P04

California executive order N-9-26, what it directs on a kill switch

Every headline below is compared with the passage on 6 axes: certainty, figures, scope, attribution, whether an attempt became a result, and whether it happened at all. Nothing here counts words.

The passage, as recorded

Through the order, the Governor is directing the Government Operations Agency: to accelerate the implementation timelines for SB 813 and AB 1405, and, in consultation with the Governor's Office of Emergency Services, to convene national experts to develop recommendations for potential changes to further strengthen state law to: ... Advance the creation of a “kill switch” for frontier models, with the efficacy of the switch verified on an ongoing basis by an independent verification organization.

gov.ca.gov · recorded as a passage, 2026-09-18 · Open the document · re-read 2026-09-19

inconclusive
The New York Times · 2026-09-18

California Governor Gavin Newsom Issues A.I. Safety Executive Order

inconclusiveby rule

No listed difference was found. The rules cover certainty, figures, scope, attribution, attempt versus outcome and polarity, and are silent on everything else, including who a claim is about and whether the passage makes it at all. Silence from the rules is not a finding that the two agree, so this one needs a person.

inconclusive
Quartz · 2026-09-18

Newsom is ordering California to pursue an AI 'kill switch' for frontier models

inconclusiveby rule

No listed difference was found. The rules cover certainty, figures, scope, attribution, attempt versus outcome and polarity, and are silent on everything else, including who a claim is about and whether the passage makes it at all. Silence from the rules is not a finding that the two agree, so this one needs a person.

inconclusive
The Verge · 2026-09-18

Gavin Newsom is pushing for an AI kill switch

inconclusiveby rule

No listed difference was found. The rules cover certainty, figures, scope, attribution, attempt versus outcome and polarity, and are silent on everything else, including who a claim is about and whether the passage makes it at all. Silence from the rules is not a finding that the two agree, so this one needs a person.

Correct this comparison

Being checked

Waiting on the source text

These are recorded but not compared yet, because the passage from the primary document has not been fetched word for word. Comparing a headline with a paraphrase would measure the paraphrase.

California signing, September 9: the governor's page lists AB 1405 and SB 813
Distillation campaign totals across outlets
The American Prospect security program story and downstream coverage
Alignment assessment white box evidence wording
Coxon resignation wording, end of the decade versus by 2030
Alabama Attorney General statement wording, unleashed, against the technical report